15 famous ghost pictures

Books, movies, television and everything else
Post Reply
User avatar
Band2
Evil Genius
Evil Genius
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Houston, TX

15 famous ghost pictures

Post by Band2 »

Here is a link to a local news story. Don't now if anyone has seen these before but some are very errie. The 11 picture looks like a mind flayer staring at the camera.

http://www.knbc.com/slideshow/entertain ... etail.html
Only two things scare me and one is former back-up dancers for Christina Aguilera.
User avatar
Ail
Evil Genius
Evil Genius
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 7:33 am
Location: Egham, UK

Post by Ail »

By the way, it seems quite common to believe that photographs can capture things that we can not, usually on film. Do you think this would apply also to digital cameras, or just the old optical ones?

Alex
Zumba d'Oxossi (A Stitch in Souragne)
Brother Eustace (The Devil's Dreams)
Robert de Moureaux (A New Barovia)
User avatar
Wiccy of the Fraternity
Membre Retiré
Membre Retiré
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 6:39 pm
Location: Powys, Cymru (Wales)

Post by Wiccy of the Fraternity »

Ail wrote:By the way, it seems quite common to believe that photographs can capture things that we can not, usually on film. Do you think this would apply also to digital cameras, or just the old optical ones?

Alex
I have seen ghostly images that have been captured on digital cameras as well as optical, so either medium works :)

It is nice to see all of those photos again, some of them (like the church minister) I'd not seen in a while. I need to get time to start visiting sites like Shadowlands again ;)
Swallow your soul!
User avatar
BigBadQDaddy
Champion of the Maiden
Champion of the Maiden
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: The Dread Realm of Minnesota

Post by BigBadQDaddy »

Thanks for the link, very cool.
User avatar
Don Fernando
Champion of the Maiden
Champion of the Maiden
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:14 am
Location: Santiago de Chile

Post by Don Fernando »

Creepy indeed. Nice pics, specially the hooded man in picture 11!! That one is spooky! :P
"6 out of 10 Rakshasas eat Whiskas"
User avatar
Band2
Evil Genius
Evil Genius
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by Band2 »

Ail wrote:By the way, it seems quite common to believe that photographs can capture things that we can not, usually on film. Do you think this would apply also to digital cameras, or just the old optical ones?

Alex
Apparantly so. I was on a Ghostwalk tour in old town Alberqueque, New Mexico, a couple of years ago. For those not familiar with a Ghostwalk tour, it is a tour around a part of town at night in which the tour guide tells stories of all the local ghosts.
At one point, behind an old church, the tour guide suggested people with digital cameras try taking some pictures in the courtyard, and they may capture some ghosts on film. A couple of people had digital cameras and did so. Reviewing the pictures showed that many of the pictures had little balls of light in various places. These were similar to those shown in the movie the sixth sense, when the mother is looking at pictures of Cole.
It was a little spooky and definitely added to the atmosphere that night.
Only two things scare me and one is former back-up dancers for Christina Aguilera.
User avatar
Wiccy of the Fraternity
Membre Retiré
Membre Retiré
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 6:39 pm
Location: Powys, Cymru (Wales)

Post by Wiccy of the Fraternity »

I went on the Albuquerque Ghost Walk myself, had a great time. Sadly I didn;t own a camera at the time so I couldn't take any snapshots :(
Swallow your soul!
User avatar
LadySoth
Evil Genius
Evil Genius
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:27 am
Location: Enduring a Thousand Injuries of Fortunato . . .

Post by LadySoth »

Ail wrote:By the way, it seems quite common to believe that photographs can capture things that we can not, usually on film. Do you think this would apply also to digital cameras, or just the old optical ones?

Alex
That's an interesting question. I would think that an optical camera would work better, digital seems so different, difinitely higher quality at any rate. It seems that perhaps digital photographs might at least help alieveate some of the hoax "ghost" photographs caused by poor work with optical cameras, although you can still get crappy pictures with digital.

Its a shame there are so many hoax photographs out there, it takes away from any "serious" study of the phenom.
~ L A D Y S O T H ~

"I rule out nothing. Nor, I imagine, do you."
"Oh, I do like to be beside the seaside . . . "
"Hail Strahd, Lord of Barovia!"
Post Reply