I must say, this thread has generated some really interesting discussions!
Llana wrote:If we're looking at correlations between modern issues to realms, then let Souragne be similar to the Haiti of the Duvalier regime, or any other postcolonial regime. What the PCs and readers come in to find are the ravages of a former government which is no longer present physically, but has left lines of division due to groups/families/sects they favoured over others. A messy topic, sure, but do you want PC's to be immediately able to spot the problems, and/or easy to resolve? Or do you want to cultivate an appreciation for how complex life can be, both fictional and real, and how marked the present is by the ravages of history?
I couldn't agree with you more, Llana. I'm all in favour of complexity, moral dilemmas, and shades of grey.
eocine wrote:As for Sourange, it should really be an amalgam of New Orleans and Hati, I'm sure that people can come up with something compelling.
I agree with that as well.
ScS of the Fraternity wrote:TwiceBorn, I like your idea of a collonist invasion as the basis for Souragne. History backs you up in that such is the sad fate of indiginous people trapped in a closed environement with conquerers.
Besides, I much perfer the idea of the upper class of Souragne having a more christian-like religion. It just doesn't jive that the rich WASPy Souragnian overlords have the same religion as their oppressed masses.
Thanks, ScS. I also agree with your view on religion in Souragne.
Llana wrote:There's a tension in not being part of the Core, where all the attention if not power seems to be focused. Is Souragne a nation trying (despite its indigenous population) to imitate the Core, struggling to build up relations there? Or does it pride itself on its differences, and turn instead to other islands? In fact, are there any attempts at some loose confederation among the islands in face of the united power of the Core? Or is that fear completely alien to them?
I draw a distinction between what I think WAS Souragne's original indigenous population, and those who currently inhabit the island (which include the descendants of colonizers and imported slaves). The RPHB indicates that "The native nobility, for their part, strive to encourage trade with other domains. They hope to expand their influence into other realms and watch Port d'Elhour emerge as a vital harbor in the Land of Mists" (p. 193). The reference to "other domains" is a bit vague... I could see Souragne wanting to build relations with the Core (larger population base to trade with), but might also seek to become a naval power and trading hub among the islands. IMC, there is a Souragnien ghetto in Nevuchar Springs (Souragniens who sought a "better life" in the Core)... but the ghetto residents now deny their Souragnien heritage (often due to the Darkonian memory loss effect). Some of those who have stayed in Souragne prefer to remain big fish in a small pond... and others simply do not have the means to leave Souragne. Bottom line: part of the populace could be proud of their Souragnien identity, while others might be ashamed of it.
Rotipher wrote:I don't actually think we need an elaborate internal war to break with the racial-line slavery system. Why not simply state that after Souragne was Mist-napped from the Material Plane, the ruling ethnic group who'd owned slaves simply weren't numerous enough to maintain their previous control over the enslaved majority? Unable to contact outside support from the armies of their former nation, in the event of a slave revolt, they opted to head off their own inevitable massacre before their slaves caught on that their masters were vulnerable: they extended full rights to some of the slave population -- i.e. the overseer-types -- in exchange for help in keeping the rest of the slaves in line. This included the right for those of the overseer-class to own land -- and slaves -- of their own.
That was when Souragne first became a domain. In the years that have passed since then, more and more descendents of slaves have moved into the upper levels of society -- where they become just as abusive as their ancestors' masters were, more often than not -- and the definition of who's eligible to be a slave has been abandoned, allowing people of either ancestry, as well as those with mixed blood, to turn up at all levels of the economic and political structure. There's still slavery, with all the abuses and corruption which that institution entails, but neither ethnic group can be deemed innocent.
Great idea, Rotipher. In Haiti there existed historically a class of people known as the "affranchis." Many were born from encounters between the European colonizers and slaves. These affranchis became a class between the elites and the slaves, and had some property rights. (Yes, I admit that this is a gross oversimplification of Haitian history). I like the way you've managed to turn some of the oppressed into the latest generation of oppressors (hmmm... sounds like what Marx would describe as a dialectical relationship!), downplaying the significance of race/colour.