Category talk:Feat
Somehow, or other, this should be cleaned up so that the 4th edition and 3rd edition feats are not mixed. Otherwise, one had to wade through the 4th ed stuff trying to find the 3rd stuff, and eventually vice versa. Cure 18:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I've been slowly adding Category:3rd Edition and Category:4th Edition as I see the opportunity. If you really want a Category:3rd Edition Feat and Category:4th Edition Feat, we could do that too. -- Gonzoron 15:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
discussion moved from Category_Talk:Combat Expertise
My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- Gonzoron 15:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Most are probably not categories. But when you have feats that depend on feats as prerequisites there may be a cace for it. Or more precisely, a half-way house of both category and non category. See the below link for the treatment of the chain from Great Cleave, through Cleave, through Power Attack:
[[1]]
Cure 16:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I think I'd rather just see a link on the Great Cleave page saying "Pre-requisite: Cleave" and maybe a category called "Power Attack Feat Family" (or Tree or Chain) that Great Cleave, Cleave, etc. all fall in. -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
3 ed & 4 ed feats need to be seperated to restore usefulness to the category of feats. Any thoughts or preferences as to how that should be done? Cure 16:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I disagree. I think it's fine to keep them all in Category:Feat, just have each feat be in Category:4th Edition or Category:3rd Edition (or both). We already have 2nd and 3rd edition spells in the spell category, no? -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
