Category talk:Combat Expertise

My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- Gonzoron 15:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Most are probably not categories. But when you have feats that depend on feats as prerequisites there may be a cace for it. Or more precisely, a half-way house of both category and non category. See the below link for the treatment of the chain from Great Cleave, through Cleave, through Power Attack:

[[1]]

Cure 16:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I think I'd rather just see a link on the Great Cleave page saying "Pre-requisite: Cleave" and maybe a category called "Power Attack Feat Family" (or Tree or Chain) that Great Cleave, Cleave, etc. all fall in. -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

---

3 ed & 4 ed feats need to be seperated to restore usefulness to the category of feats. Any thoughts or preferences as to how that should be done? Cure 16:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I disagree. I think it's fine to keep them all in Category:Feat, just have each feat be in Category:4th Edition or Category:3rd Edition (or both). We already have 2nd and 3rd edition spells in the spell category, no? -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)