Question Regarding Lord of the Necropolis

Discussing all things Ravenloft
Post Reply
User avatar
yergerjo
Conspirator
Conspirator
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:04 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Question Regarding Lord of the Necropolis

Post by yergerjo »

I just finally had opportunity to read this novel. I understand that the novel is considered "non-canon" along with the Malken book.

My question is: At what point is it considered non-canon?

The entire novel? Or the last section "The coming of Necropolis"?

Honestly I enjoyed the book, and feel that it was true and complete with everything else I have read in Ravenloft until that final section.

Thanks.
User avatar
brothersale
Evil Genius
Evil Genius
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:02 am

Post by brothersale »

Non-canon tends to mean the whole book, but you are right it was the final section of the book that dares to define the DP that got it declared as non-canon.
All great movements require a few martyrs... -Moebius (soulreaver 2)
User avatar
Rotipher of the FoS
Thieving Crow
Thieving Crow
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 4:18 pm

Post by Rotipher of the FoS »

If you want to salvage the book from oblivion, it's simplest to proclaim that the final section isn't the real truth, but the DPs yanking disembodied Azalin's chain yet again. Just as King of the Dead messed with the lich's perceptions and memories of the past, so Lord of the Necropolis can be viewed as the Dark Powers' humoring Azalin's unspoken (and self-centered) expectations about his "tormentors".
"Who [u]cares[/u] what the Dark Powers are? They're [i]bastards![/i] That's all I need to know of them." -- Crow
Post Reply