DeepShadow of FoS wrote:Right, as opposed to Ravenloft, which is a land where if you write the stuff, you get to make Darklords invincible, unkillable, omnipotent, and protected by the Dark Powers... which you yourself invented.
So the difference is...in RL Elminster would be a Darklord, or at least very evil.
Not quite.
The vast majority of Darklords are very clearly neither "invincible" nor "unkillable" nor "omnipotent". There are only a handful that qualify for any one of those categories, and in my opinion none which qualify for all three. (The mere presence of a curse immediately disqualifies them from "omnipotent", for example.) The one Darklord who appears to have near-omniscient powers, Azalin, still has a canonically listed method of elimination: destroy his phylactery and then destroy his corporeal form.
It is true that the FR untouchables also are not strictly speaking omnipotent (or possibly even the other two) but when you start looking at their level totals, they're so far above player power levels that they may as well be. Their CRs for 3rd ed. (the last edition I was familiar with) were well above Ravenloft Darklord CR levels, often with a double-digit margin.
So, equating Ravenloft Darklords with FR's untouchables is not persuasive. Even Ravenloft canon establishes several Darklord deaths, such as Bakholis and Gundar. Several Ravenloft adventures allow for Darklord deaths, such as Gabrielle Aderre and Yagno Petrovna (even if those endings are considered noncanon). Compare this to FR, where the storylines seem to twist out of shape in order to feature one of these darlings and yet have them emerge unscathed.
Greyhawk had similar problems in 1st Ed. AD&D, and appears to trip over them quite a bit in
Vecna Lives!, but they seemed to have moved away from the everpresent superhero theme (Rary's assassination of key members of the Circle of Eight was an interesting step towards power de-escalation).
Ravenloft, properly done, avoids this altogether. Are the Dark Powers protecting the DLs because of darling-patron coddling? Or are they there as a cosmic Aesop's fable of punishment? Far more interesting than some demigod-level character who can't make up his mind between being a doddering village wiseman smoking a pipe on one hand, or an intercontinental sorcerous 007 type who saves the world and lays every other goddess he comes across.