Talk:Chartered Mistways

Is this supposed to be "Charted Mistways?" DeepShadow

Clearly. But while on the topic, what is a "charted Mistway" as opposed to an "Uncharted Mistway"? How known does a mistway have to be before it is charted and by whom? I can understand the idea of more and of less well known mistways, but surely any mistway that we do talk about is known to at least someone, and I am not sure that I see the point of having a second category of mistways that are known to at least someone but haven't yet hit the "charts." More to the point, what would be useful is determining, to the degree possible, how well known a mistway is and by whom. For example, is the mistway south of Arbora known as such, and widely, or is there just a Misty Border there that is to be feared as far as the locals are concerned?Cure 05:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Agreed that it should be "Charted" but the point is moot now that it's Category:Mistway anyway. I don't see a difference between charted and uncharted mistways either. Note that "Charted Mistways" is the title of the sidebar introducing them in RCS (and RLPH). It's probably the same as "Known Mistways" for our purpose. As far as who knows about them, I think that's probably DM prerogative unless there was something about it in VRGttM that I've forgotten. -- Gonzoron 21:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)