Category talk:Guardian (Protector)

Don't think this belongs in Category:monster. Not sure where it goes. Thoughts? -- Gonzoron 00:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

It is not exactly monster, not exactly profession, and not exactly society. How about security? In a related vane, I haven't decided how to classify wards and allegens either.Cure 02:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Maybe a catch-all category of "Concept" or something? maybe change Category:Institution to Category:Concept? Not sure what you mean by wards. Aren't they spells? Allergens are Items, I would think. -- Gonzoron 14:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I realise this is a philosophical point, but Category:institution shouldn't be changed and is perhaps the most fundamentla category in the Mistipedia. Taboo, law, langauge, the difference between ruler and ruled, and history are not things we sat down, discussed and invented by committee. Rather, to the degree that there was invention, they invented us. For they make us human. They instituted us. Try discussing language, without language. It can't be done.

Wards can be spells, but also plants, the smoke of herbs, a line of seeds, an allergen actually too. They afford protection. Hence my thought about a possible category:security.Cure 23:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Wow, didn't know you felt so passionately about it. ;) OK, sure, I don't really care one way or another. Plants, smoke, and seeds are all Items, IMHO. So I guess both spells and items can be wards. I have no problem with Ward and Guardian being in a Security category. I suppose Security can be an Institution or sit within an existing one. Your call... -- Gonzoron 00:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)