Category talk:Grave

Okay, this is slightly messed up here IMO. "Sea" should be a category, if it's not already, but making it a subcategory of grave is going to lead to a lot of confusion. While I agree that it is a form of impromptu, unconsecrated grave, the same could be said of mountains, roads, forests or anywhere else a body could get lost. I vote that the entire "sea" entry here be rolled into the grave entry itself, perhaps as a subsection on the same page. And I'm willing to venture that "grave" should not be the umbrella category here, but rather something like "final resting place" or whatnot, insofar as a tomb (structure above ground) is not actually a grave (hole in the ground). DeepShadow 05:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Wikipedia uses "Burial Monuments and Structures" but that's a bit formal for my taste. I'm gonna go with "Burial Site" unless someone comes up with something better. I know it's not 100% accurate, since not every body gets actually buried, but "final resting place" sounds a little too euphemistic. Burial site should get the point across, I think. -- Gonzoron 01:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)