Template talk:Dombox: Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gonzoron (talk | contribs)
Created page with '"Always a single darklord" isn't exactly true, including your example. Ivan and Ivana are co-darklords, according to all sources I know of. Also, the Nightmare Court and the Th…'
 
Nerit (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
"Always a single darklord" isn't exactly true, including your example.  Ivan and Ivana are co-darklords, according to all sources I know of.  Also, the Nightmare Court and the Three Hags of Tepest share darklordship.  (And that's just the canon ones.  Lots of non-canon domains seem to like going the multi-darklord route).  The template should be able to handle these cases without forcing us to refer to the co-darklords by a group name.  (It might make sense to use the group name for the Nightmare Court or even the three hags, but I think most people expect to see "Ivan Dilisyna and Ivana Boritsi" as darklords of Borca, not "The Dark Twins") -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
"Always a single darklord" isn't exactly true, including your example.  Ivan and Ivana are co-darklords, according to all sources I know of.  Also, the Nightmare Court and the Three Hags of Tepest share darklordship.  (And that's just the canon ones.  Lots of non-canon domains seem to like going the multi-darklord route).  The template should be able to handle these cases without forcing us to refer to the co-darklords by a group name.  (It might make sense to use the group name for the Nightmare Court or even the three hags, but I think most people expect to see "Ivan Dilisyna and Ivana Boritsi" as darklords of Borca, not "The Dark Twins") -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
: I myself don't know a way to handle multiple links in one entry. Darn. I suppose I'll just have to remove the link envelope (that is, it just has [[ and ]] wrapped around the darklord entry). For someone reason I had thought I'd read that there was only 1 darklord per domain. Oopsie.  --[[User:Nerit|Nerit]] 01:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:37, 21 January 2010

"Always a single darklord" isn't exactly true, including your example. Ivan and Ivana are co-darklords, according to all sources I know of. Also, the Nightmare Court and the Three Hags of Tepest share darklordship. (And that's just the canon ones. Lots of non-canon domains seem to like going the multi-darklord route). The template should be able to handle these cases without forcing us to refer to the co-darklords by a group name. (It might make sense to use the group name for the Nightmare Court or even the three hags, but I think most people expect to see "Ivan Dilisyna and Ivana Boritsi" as darklords of Borca, not "The Dark Twins") -- Gonzoron 14:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I myself don't know a way to handle multiple links in one entry. Darn. I suppose I'll just have to remove the link envelope (that is, it just has and wrapped around the darklord entry). For someone reason I had thought I'd read that there was only 1 darklord per domain. Oopsie. --Nerit 01:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)