While checking the map in every detail for a pet project, I noticed the Darkon map shows "Mountains of Madness" instead of "Mountains of Misery".
There was a cartographer who was thinking too much about Lovecraft?
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
Actually, that error originated with me -- I accidentally wrote Madness instead of Misery on the sketch map I submitted, and no one after me caught the error. (It certainly wasn't the cartographer's job to doublecheck.)
*lol* Funny mistake, had read too many Lovecraft book just days before?
But now that the Mountains of Madness are set in Darkon, how can we say that lovecraftian myths do not mix well with RL?
I'll add this to the errata list.
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 1:08 am
Post subject: Lyssa von Zarovich, the Moutains of Misery
Lyssa von Zarovich acquiring power by having a ghost age her is just wrong.
The Mountains of Misery should have been called the Mountains of Madness, in a tribute to Lovecraft, and been home not to Ebb, who is cool but was just fine shacked up with Azalin, but rather abberations.
_________________
The cure for what ails you
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 9:43 pm
Post subject: perhaps not a drawven realm but . . .
Perhaps the Mountains of Misery have an older and carefully forgotten name, the Mountains of Madness. Run Lovecraft's famous horror story of the same name in terms of a rescue party sent after dwarven miners who had set off to stake their claim but instead discovered primoridal and alien ruins haunted by horrors even worse than those depicted by the monsterous, weathered, ageless mosaics. A human variation would involve an expedition led by the old professor, from the former university of Il Aluk, who had the run in with the goblyns while studying Forlorn's flora.
Good memory, cure! I didn't remember these topics being already discussed.
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
And if I may ask, why do the details shown on Gaz domain maps vary wildly? In Gaz 1 for ex, the Barovia map shows nearly everythingdiscussed in the text, but the Kartakass or Hazlan maps shows very few in comparison?
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
Joël of the FoS wrote:And if I may ask, why do the details shown on Gaz domain maps vary wildly? In Gaz 1 for ex, the Barovia map shows nearly everythingdiscussed in the text, but the Kartakass or Hazlan maps shows very few in comparison?
Joël
This was a question I had to make too.
While in the first two Gazetteers the maps are, generally, more detailed (Barovia and Darkon, mainly), from Gaz III on we have merely a "zoom" on the basic map. In the Gaz IV the maps are mostly unintelligible (white on light grey? ), not to mention the wonderful map of the Shadow Rift in Gaz V...
I coloni rovinavano la foresta costruendo il capolavoro dell'uomo civilizzato: il deserto.
- Luis Sepúlveda
Joël of the FoS wrote:And if I may ask, why do the details shown on Gaz domain maps vary wildly? In Gaz 1 for ex, the Barovia map shows nearly everythingdiscussed in the text, but the Kartakass or Hazlan maps shows very few in comparison?
More detailed maps mean the chapter's author sent the developers a map. If it's just a reprint, that means the author didn't.
Specific examples:
Early on, I didn't submit a Kartakass map because there wasn't much to label anyway and I assumed the developers would fill in forest names from my text anyway. Darkon's map is detailed because I learned my lesson after that. Borca didn't have a map because I didn't have the time or energy.
Thank you John. I'm asking because I'm working on something to accompany these domains without a detailed map.
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
HuManBing wrote:
Monsters of Faerun, eh? That's intriguing - given that in 2nd ed. the shadow dragons were allegedly one of the Greyhawk races of dragons.
Well, if memory serves, the most famous shadow dragon in DnD literature was Shimmergloom, who battled Drizzt Do'Urden in Mithril Hall (although I haven't personally read that one of Salvatore's novels, so someone do correct me if my info is wrong).
[i]"I too have begun to wonder about the legendary wisdom of our guardian angel and his pet rock."
~ Evee Beiderbecke[/i]