How did we got that this book has something to do (even vaguely) with Eberron?


No, I agree that it's about how it sells. But I really doubt that Ravenloft would be the ultimate "past setting" seller compared to say, Dark Sun, Planescape, or even Mystara.Undead Cabbage wrote:When trying to guess the intentions of business men, you need to think like businessmen.
WOTC doesn't hate RL, it just doesn't think it will sell. This module may very well be WOTC testing the water for RL fans. If this makes money for Wizards, then I sincerely doubt they would cut it off there. They have the rights to a really good setting, which has maintained its popularity despite its misfortune.
I think they may try to do something similar to Manual of the PLanes with regards to PlaneScape: a sort of "digest version" of the demiplane that allows you to just plop in anywhere, with streamlined rules for horor, darklords, etc...Undead Cabbage wrote:When trying to guess the intentions of business men, you need to think like businessmen.
WOTC doesn't hate RL, it just doesn't think it will sell. This module may very well be WOTC testing the water for RL fans. If this makes money for Wizards, then I sincerely doubt they would cut it off there. They have the rights to a really good setting, which has maintained its popularity despite its misfortune.
Who knows, after this we may see a 3e version of 'The House on Griffon hill', only hopefully better made than the original.
Question: Do you think they would dare make it an adventure that takes place pre-ravenloft's existance? I.e. the tergs and the Von Zarovich family are all of a suddenly a part of ebberon?
Well I just want to be proven wrong, and you rightRotipher wrote:Or maybe it is a game-setting book, like what was done for Dragonlance -- not a full-fledged relaunch, just an in-house 3.5 update -- and they're calling it "Castle Ravenloft" to avoid confusion with past products of that name (or possibly foster it, for collectors who'd give their right arm to get their hands on the original I6), not because it's necessarily yet another wacky adventure in Strahd's house.
I was speaking to Trebor about this earlier. I said what if WotC is publishing Ravenloft like they did Dragonlance, then a third party company is publishing the accessories. He raised a good quesion, who would do it?Scipion_Emilien wrote:Im not a specialist of this so i ask the question:
Could Ravenloft be get back by an others companie like this was the case for sovereign press?
And what would happen if sovereign press revert the right of Dragonlance to WoTC, will WoTC sell it to others, make a new campaign setting and what will happen of the past sovereign press publication?
(Of course I ask to see if a parrallel can be done with Ravenloft)
Uh?!?alhoon wrote:- The fact that what D&D considers "nuissance monsters" like orcs and goblins finally get a nation. I have always included such nations to my campaigns and many people thought I was a heretic.
If they did that, they'd probably tick off the die-hard Eberron fans even more than the Ravenloft-buffs! One of the reasons why people like Eberron is that it doesn't cadge cultures from IRL history, hence seems uniquely refreshing as a game-setting. Dumping a bunch of faux-Slavic and pseudo-Turk imports into Khorvaire would really, really break with that image, even disregarding all the other differences in setting.Undead Cabbage wrote:Question: Do you think they would dare make it an adventure that takes place pre-ravenloft's existance? I.e. the tergs and the Von Zarovich family are all of a suddenly a part of ebberon?
I would not say that the quality of the average line was so bad with what WW give us. Of course there is editing and mapping and some mistake (CoD and HoL and the RLCS). But if WoTC get back the license, will this mean that we will get a Faerunise Ravenloft? I mean a Ravenloft with more high fantasy that we are use and what we expected to?Don Fernando wrote:One thing is for sure, the quality of the product will be superior... I was missing quality in RL products.