Talk:City: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should or shouldn't we break down population centres by, for example, city, town, village? | Should or shouldn't we break down population centres by, for example, city, town, village? [[User:Cure|Cure]] 01:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
I can see a case for doing it and for not doing it. | I can see a case for doing it and for not doing it. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:sounds like an over-complication to me. Categorization is good, but over-categorization seems like a waste of time better spent on other tasks. Just My 2cp. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 01:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | :sounds like an over-complication to me. Categorization is good, but over-categorization seems like a waste of time better spent on other tasks. Just My 2cp. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 01:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
(PS - to get the neat signature that some of have been using on the Talk pages, type <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> | (PS - to get the neat signature that some of have been using on the Talk pages, type <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> | ||
OK, stick with city. | |||
And thanx. | |||
[[User:Cure|Cure]] 01:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 27 January 2010
Should or shouldn't we break down population centres by, for example, city, town, village? Cure 01:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I can see a case for doing it and for not doing it.
If we do do it, what consists each in terms of population must be defined.
- sounds like an over-complication to me. Categorization is good, but over-categorization seems like a waste of time better spent on other tasks. Just My 2cp. -- Gonzoron 01:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
(PS - to get the neat signature that some of have been using on the Talk pages, type ~~~~
OK, stick with city.
And thanx.
Cure 01:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
