Death of a Darklord rereleased?
- ScS of the Fraternity
- Moderator
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
-
- Conspirator
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:06 am
- Contact:
Something that comes to my mind is that the company may be re-editing the book, making it mesh more with Canon.
Another thing that comes to mind is that they might be trying to feel out the market. If the demand for the novel is strong, they might publish new novels and even restart the setting. A good run of fiction might create a demand for the setting again.
One of the things that points in this direction is the publishing of Heros of Horror, as well as DoaDL. WoTC has standard (and some non-standard) fantasy settings, but nothing (AFAIK) in the way of a horror setting. It could be that they are feeling out to see if this niche market is strong enough for an effort and the obvious expense, of developing.
Another thing that comes to mind is that they might be trying to feel out the market. If the demand for the novel is strong, they might publish new novels and even restart the setting. A good run of fiction might create a demand for the setting again.
One of the things that points in this direction is the publishing of Heros of Horror, as well as DoaDL. WoTC has standard (and some non-standard) fantasy settings, but nothing (AFAIK) in the way of a horror setting. It could be that they are feeling out to see if this niche market is strong enough for an effort and the obvious expense, of developing.
- ScS of the Fraternity
- Moderator
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Perhaps, but again, let's not encourage people to buy books they don't want (or already own) under the idea that such actions might get Wotc to start up the line again.
In of itself, such a marketing stategy would be foolharty at best. All of those novels are many years old and can be found at used bookstores and libraries all over North America. As well, a number of those books (like Death of a Darklord) have already been given awful reviews.
All together, that suggests that this second run of the novels is only going to attack a tiny fraction of the market for Ravenloft novels.
From that, we can deduce that IF this is a strategy to test the markets, THEN who ever is doing it can't be very bright (or just isn't paying attention), THEREFORE the results of said marketing experiment will either be fatally skewed, or not be used to form a proper conclusion.
Next, I highly doibt that any of the books will be rewritten to sync with canon. Since that entails rewriting an authors work, that would be violation of publishing ethics. It makes even less sense for them to get the original authors to rewrite their own work, since if they were going to spend that kind of money, they would just commision a new novel (which would definitly sell better than any reprint).
In of itself, such a marketing stategy would be foolharty at best. All of those novels are many years old and can be found at used bookstores and libraries all over North America. As well, a number of those books (like Death of a Darklord) have already been given awful reviews.
All together, that suggests that this second run of the novels is only going to attack a tiny fraction of the market for Ravenloft novels.
From that, we can deduce that IF this is a strategy to test the markets, THEN who ever is doing it can't be very bright (or just isn't paying attention), THEREFORE the results of said marketing experiment will either be fatally skewed, or not be used to form a proper conclusion.
Next, I highly doibt that any of the books will be rewritten to sync with canon. Since that entails rewriting an authors work, that would be violation of publishing ethics. It makes even less sense for them to get the original authors to rewrite their own work, since if they were going to spend that kind of money, they would just commision a new novel (which would definitly sell better than any reprint).
Evil Reigns!!!!
- Joël of the FoS
- Moderator
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 1:24 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: St-Damien, Québec
I've asked the author message board about this question: it isn't a new book, and it hasn't changed a iota.
It's just a re-release with a new cover.
I agree with my colleague Stephen. On buying it? I won't since I have the previous release. However, if I didn't have it yet, then I would probably buy it.
Joël
It's just a re-release with a new cover.
I agree with my colleague Stephen. On buying it? I won't since I have the previous release. However, if I didn't have it yet, then I would probably buy it.
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
- Catman Jim
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:58 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sunny Florida
I feel the same way about the slew of old Dragonlance novels that WotC has been re-publishing for the last year or two. I bought them when they first came out (1980's), and have no need to have another copy of each one with a different cover now. I wonder how well these are selling, and if that, combined with what letters & requests we have sent to WotC, is what is prompting them to republish DoaD/Ravenloft line novels now?ScS of the Fraternity wrote:Perhaps, but again, let's not encourage people to buy books they don't want (or already own) under the idea that such actions might get Wotc to start up the line again.
In of itself, such a marketing stategy would be foolharty at best. All of those novels are many years old and can be found at used bookstores and libraries all over North America.
I only wish I had retired sooner!
So if I get this straight, they are actually rereleasing one of the worst (IMHO) RL book ever written?Joël of the Fraternity wrote:I've asked the author message board about this question: it isn't a new book, and it hasn't changed a iota.
It's just a re-release with a new cover.
I agree with my colleague Stephen. On buying it? I won't since I have the previous release. However, if I didn't have it yet, then I would probably buy it.
Joël
De retour dans les Brumes, enfin!
-
- Arch-villain
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 7:49 pm
- Contact:
They're doing it to cash in on Laurell K. Hamilton's popularity--the May--August 2006 catalog makes this quite explicit, giving her name the kind of billing usually reserved for Salvatore or Weis & Hickman novels from WotC, and promoting it as a 'lost gem' from Hamilton.Charney wrote: So if I get this straight, they are actually rereleasing one of the worst (IMHO) RL book ever written?
Matthew L. Martin
- Catman Jim
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:58 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sunny Florida
Have you all seen that Death of a Darklord has been RE-re-released? Last year, it came out as a large size paperback selling for $13 US, if you didn't buy it then, you have another chance. This month, it has again hit the bookstore shelves, now as a regular size paperback going for $8 US.
I only wish I had retired sooner!
- Rotipher of the FoS
- Thieving Crow
- Posts: 4683
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 4:18 pm
Meh. I doubt if the re-re-release of Hamilton's travesty will do any more damage than it already has.
OTOH, this probably means the other Covenant reprints will be coming out in mass-market form in turn. (DoaD was the first novel to be re-released.) That's not a bad thing, as it'll put Ravenloft back on the main scifi/fantasy bookshelves of stores that segregate their trade paperbacks from the rest.
On a positive note, Scholar of Decay appears as a trade paperback this month. Rodent-lovers, take note!
OTOH, this probably means the other Covenant reprints will be coming out in mass-market form in turn. (DoaD was the first novel to be re-released.) That's not a bad thing, as it'll put Ravenloft back on the main scifi/fantasy bookshelves of stores that segregate their trade paperbacks from the rest.
On a positive note, Scholar of Decay appears as a trade paperback this month. Rodent-lovers, take note!
"Who [u]cares[/u] what the Dark Powers are? They're [i]bastards![/i] That's all I need to know of them." -- Crow
They might not have timed it very well-- I think her latest didn't chart nearly as high as everyone hoped, and her current fans will probably be wondering about the lack of group sex with guys whose schlongs are the size of 22oz beer cans.Matthew L. Martin wrote: They're doing it to cash in on Laurell K. Hamilton's popularity--the May--August 2006 catalog makes this quite explicit, giving her name the kind of billing usually reserved for Salvatore or Weis & Hickman novels from WotC, and promoting it as a 'lost gem' from Hamilton.
- Joël of the FoS
- Moderator
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 1:24 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: St-Damien, Québec
I've only read one, the first Anita Blake, and I've had enough. It was lame and how she depicts the human emotions in face of various situations simply not credible.
But Brandi you seems to have read her more than I did?
Joël
But Brandi you seems to have read her more than I did?
Joël
"A full set of (game) rules is so massively complicated that the only time they were all bound together in a single volume, they underwent gravitational collapse and became a black hole" (Adams)
- Catman Jim
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:58 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sunny Florida
I have read most of the Anita Blake novels. Recently, I heard about the popularity of the Stephanie Meyer books, ("Eclipse" is currently on the best seller list), and read those. It was apparent to me that Meyer is taking the premise of Hamilton's work, and presenting a "teen" version of it. I for one became tired quickly with ALL the teen angst! (more angst than even Anne Rice gives!) Obviously there's a market for it, they are selling well, and Meyer has been making the rounds on the TV talk shows.
I only wish I had retired sooner!