Category:Property: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Some anthropologists theorize that the [[advent]] of the [[institution]] of property the [[incest taboo]], in that the bartering of daughters inspired the notion of trade. Others believe that the notion of property derives from competition for scarce resources. In either case, in most known cultures, theft of property is taboo. The [[transgression]] of this [[taboo]] by a [[darklord]] or a [[temporal leader]] in a given land could have repercussions upon the integrity of property relations and of property itself in that land. | Some anthropologists theorize that the [[advent]] of the [[institution]] of property the [[incest taboo]], in that the bartering of daughters inspired the notion of trade. Others believe that the notion of property derives from competition for scarce resources. In either case, in most known cultures, theft of property is taboo. The [[transgression]] of this [[taboo]] by a [[darklord]] or a [[temporal leader]] in a given land could have repercussions upon the integrity of property relations and of property itself in that land. | ||
[[Strahd von Zarovich]] may be a case in point. He attempted to steal the "property" of his [[Sergei von Zarovich|brother]] for himself. As a consequence of this and related acts, the entirety of [[Barovia]] is now his property to a degree that exceeds that of any mundane [[king]], but he is [[cursed]] to never take [[possession]] of [[Tatyana Federovna]] even as her [[reincarnation|reincarnations]] haunt his land. Unsurprisingly, Strahd views the commission of certain [[crime|crimes]] within his [[land]] in terms of [[theft]]. A [[murder]] is a theft of human resources, is robbery the [[blood bank]]. | [[Strahd von Zarovich]] may be a case in point. He attempted to steal the "property" of his [[Sergei von Zarovich|brother]] for himself. As a consequence of this and related acts, the entirety of [[Barovia]] is now his property to a degree that exceeds that of any mundane [[king]], but he is [[cursed]] to never take [[possession]] of [[Tatyana Federovna]] even as her [[reincarnation|reincarnations]] haunt his land. Unsurprisingly, Strahd views the commission of certain [[crime|crimes]] within his [[land]] in terms of [[theft]]. A [[murder]] is a theft of human resources, is robbery from the [[blood bank]]. | ||
The curious property | The curious property relations in [[Vechor]] are conceivably an expression of its even more curious [[darklord]]. | ||
[[Category:Item]][[Category:Location]][[Category:Institution]][[Category:Economy]] | [[Category:Item]][[Category:Location]][[Category:Institution]][[Category:Economy]] | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 9 January 2011
Speculation
 |
This section contains Homebrew non-canon info, created by fans |
Some anthropologists theorize that the advent of the institution of property the incest taboo, in that the bartering of daughters inspired the notion of trade. Others believe that the notion of property derives from competition for scarce resources. In either case, in most known cultures, theft of property is taboo. The transgression of this taboo by a darklord or a temporal leader in a given land could have repercussions upon the integrity of property relations and of property itself in that land.
Strahd von Zarovich may be a case in point. He attempted to steal the "property" of his brother for himself. As a consequence of this and related acts, the entirety of Barovia is now his property to a degree that exceeds that of any mundane king, but he is cursed to never take possession of Tatyana Federovna even as her reincarnations haunt his land. Unsurprisingly, Strahd views the commission of certain crimes within his land in terms of theft. A murder is a theft of human resources, is robbery from the blood bank.
The curious property relations in Vechor are conceivably an expression of its even more curious darklord.
Subcategories
This category has the following 11 subcategories, out of 11 total.
