Category talk:Haunted House: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
IMHO, [[:Category:Haunted]] would go in [[:Category:Trait]] for that reason. The actual Haunted thing would have its own Location, NPC, or Object category or subcategory (a "Set category or "box") anyway, so Haunted (or Cursed) is more like a label/"topic"-catgegory that goes on top of that. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 13:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC) | IMHO, [[:Category:Haunted]] would go in [[:Category:Trait]] for that reason. The actual Haunted thing would have its own Location, NPC, or Object category or subcategory (a "Set category or "box") anyway, so Haunted (or Cursed) is more like a label/"topic"-catgegory that goes on top of that. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 13:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Still not sure if Haunted House should stay as well, though... -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 13:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:48, 11 September 2010
Should this be redirected to Haunted Site or simply deleted? cure
I'm tempted to say that both could be replaced with Category:Haunted. Similar to Cursed, which can apply to people, items, etc., the trait of being Haunted is not limited to locations. dunno... would someone search for "haunted house?" I think they might. Sadly, the software doesn't let you search for the intersection of two categories, so maybe haunted house has value... -- Gonzoron 12:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Haunted has the disadvantage of being more difficult to itself categorise given that a given instance may be a person or a thing, non? (Or is that just me be rusty at this?) User:Cure
IMHO, Category:Haunted would go in Category:Trait for that reason. The actual Haunted thing would have its own Location, NPC, or Object category or subcategory (a "Set category or "box") anyway, so Haunted (or Cursed) is more like a label/"topic"-catgegory that goes on top of that. -- Gonzoron 13:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Still not sure if Haunted House should stay as well, though... -- Gonzoron 13:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
