Category talk:Animated Toys: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'Golem and Construct or just Construct?~~~~' |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Golem and Construct or just Construct?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 07:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | Golem and Construct or just Construct?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 07:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Ticky... The MM defines golems as construct created through magic and animated with an elemental earth spirit. Obviously Ravenloft changes that a bit, and in the RCS, the Dread Golem template is supposedly for any construct brought to life though a dark obsession. But that template gives a lot of bonuses that I don't think every Ravenloft construct needs to have, even though the vast majority of constructs in Ravenloft probably came into being through a dark obsession. | |||
Ultimately, it's an arbitrary distinction, and I think the easiest line to draw is: If it's got Golem in the name, it's a Golem, if not, not. Any counterexamples? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 20:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:47, 18 February 2010
Golem and Construct or just Construct?Cure 07:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Ticky... The MM defines golems as construct created through magic and animated with an elemental earth spirit. Obviously Ravenloft changes that a bit, and in the RCS, the Dread Golem template is supposedly for any construct brought to life though a dark obsession. But that template gives a lot of bonuses that I don't think every Ravenloft construct needs to have, even though the vast majority of constructs in Ravenloft probably came into being through a dark obsession.
Ultimately, it's an arbitrary distinction, and I think the easiest line to draw is: If it's got Golem in the name, it's a Golem, if not, not. Any counterexamples? -- Gonzoron 20:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
