Category talk:Fiend: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m →addressing non-outsider fiends: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I wouldn't even put Strahd on there. What's next, deviled eggs? ;) But sure, if Strahd is on there because some people ''think'' he's a devil and (like in real folklore) aren't too picky about what's a vampire and whats a demon, sure put him on there with an explanation, and Isolde could be on there too with a similar explanation that Pacali and his cronies ''think'' she's a fiend of some sort. As long as it's clear. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 21:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | :I wouldn't even put Strahd on there. What's next, deviled eggs? ;) But sure, if Strahd is on there because some people ''think'' he's a devil and (like in real folklore) aren't too picky about what's a vampire and whats a demon, sure put him on there with an explanation, and Isolde could be on there too with a similar explanation that Pacali and his cronies ''think'' she's a fiend of some sort. As long as it's clear. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 21:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
== addressing non-outsider fiends == | |||
given that CotN:D expanded the definition of fiends to include non-outsiders, it's not quite accurate to have Category:Fiend be in Category:Outsider. I know it's kind of weird, but since Fiend is now a cross-type category, wouldn't it belong in [[:Category:Other Monster Groupings]] instead? (much like [[:Category:Mist Creatures]]) -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 22:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:13, 17 February 2010
Insofar as this is now a category, the list at the top is redundant, no? DeepShadow 14:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Addressed Cure 15:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I would argue that Isolde is an Category:Outsider, but not a Category:Fiend -- Gonzoron 15:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would agree. Since we have Strahd on the list for his nickname, perhaps we should specify that this is Pacali's hypothesis? DeepShadow 16:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I wouldn't even put Strahd on there. What's next, deviled eggs? ;) But sure, if Strahd is on there because some people think he's a devil and (like in real folklore) aren't too picky about what's a vampire and whats a demon, sure put him on there with an explanation, and Isolde could be on there too with a similar explanation that Pacali and his cronies think she's a fiend of some sort. As long as it's clear. -- Gonzoron 21:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
addressing non-outsider fiends
given that CotN:D expanded the definition of fiends to include non-outsiders, it's not quite accurate to have Category:Fiend be in Category:Outsider. I know it's kind of weird, but since Fiend is now a cross-type category, wouldn't it belong in Category:Other Monster Groupings instead? (much like Category:Mist Creatures) -- Gonzoron 22:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
