Category talk:Location: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with 'I see someone put City as a subcategory of location. Since it wasn't that way in the Catalogue, it's jarring to me, but maybe it's just me and my latent Catalgue-bias. Does it …' |
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I see someone put City as a subcategory of location. Since it wasn't that way in the Catalogue, it's jarring to me, but maybe it's just me and my latent Catalgue-bias. Does it seem intuitive to others this way? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 16:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | I see someone put City as a subcategory of location. Since it wasn't that way in the Catalogue, it's jarring to me, but maybe it's just me and my latent Catalgue-bias. Does it seem intuitive to others this way? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 16:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Sounds right. In the same sense that a vampire is a kind of undead, or a Treant is a kind of plant, a city is a kind of location.[[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 01:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 27 January 2010
I see someone put City as a subcategory of location. Since it wasn't that way in the Catalogue, it's jarring to me, but maybe it's just me and my latent Catalgue-bias. Does it seem intuitive to others this way? -- Gonzoron 16:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Sounds right. In the same sense that a vampire is a kind of undead, or a Treant is a kind of plant, a city is a kind of location.DeepShadow 01:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
