Category talk:Haunted House

Should this be redirected to Haunted Site or simply deleted? cure

I'm tempted to say that both could be replaced with Category:Haunted. Similar to Cursed, which can apply to people, items, etc., the trait of being Haunted is not limited to locations. dunno... would someone search for "haunted house?" I think they might. Sadly, the software doesn't let you search for the intersection of two categories, so maybe haunted house has value... -- Gonzoron 12:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Haunted has the disadvantage of being more difficult to itself categorise given that a given instance may be a person or a thing, non? (Or is that just me be rusty at this?) User:Cure

IMHO, Category:Haunted would go in Category:Trait for that reason. The actual Haunted thing would have its own Location, NPC, or Object category or subcategory (a "Set category or "box") anyway, so Haunted (or Cursed) is more like a label/"topic"-catgegory that goes on top of that. -- Gonzoron 13:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Still not sure if Haunted House should stay as well, though... -- Gonzoron 13:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Your HO strikes me as being sound. As to Haunted House then, I would be tempted to keep it, as there are several (Lament and Griffon Hill most notably), and it make a reasonable entry under the categories of Haunted and House and/or Residence. cure

(PS Please remind me how to get me user name to pop up with the date and such.)

Fair enough. Haunted house stays, and Category:Haunted House goes in both Haunted and House. -- Gonzoron 00:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC) (PS like this: ~~~~