Category talk:El-Koth: Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
D'Ysmaul (talk | contribs)
Created page with 'Shouldn't this be a page, rather than a category? -- ~~~~'
 
Gonzoron (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Shouldn't this be [[El-Koth|a page]], rather than a category? -- [[User:D'Ysmaul|D'Ysmaul]] 19:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be [[El-Koth|a page]], rather than a category? -- [[User:D'Ysmaul|D'Ysmaul]] 19:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
By Mistipedia standards, no.  Depending on how you interpret the Gaz, they are either a Society or a Monster type.  Either way, there were more than one of them, and therefore they are a category.  Early on, we decided that Societies and Monsters would be categories, to allow individuals to be members of the category.  (If you want to debate that, head on back to [[Mistipedia talk:Categorization Guidelines]]. :) ).  Right now, there are no known El-Koth Individuals, AFAIK but were someone to create one, it would be in [[:Category:El-Koth]].  -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 20:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:17, 25 May 2010

Shouldn't this be a page, rather than a category? -- D'Ysmaul 19:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

By Mistipedia standards, no. Depending on how you interpret the Gaz, they are either a Society or a Monster type. Either way, there were more than one of them, and therefore they are a category. Early on, we decided that Societies and Monsters would be categories, to allow individuals to be members of the category. (If you want to debate that, head on back to Mistipedia talk:Categorization Guidelines. :) ). Right now, there are no known El-Koth Individuals, AFAIK but were someone to create one, it would be in Category:El-Koth. -- Gonzoron 20:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)