<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AOubliette</id>
	<title>Talk:Oubliette - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AOubliette"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oubliette&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T04:58:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oubliette&amp;diff=23600&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Cure: Created page with &#039;While I agree that Oubilettes are questionable, I am not sure it is correct to describe them as info revealed by creators from never published sources. An entire source book was …&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oubliette&amp;diff=23600&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2010-02-20T01:22:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;While I agree that Oubilettes are questionable, I am not sure it is correct to describe them as info revealed by creators from never published sources. An entire source book was …&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;While I agree that Oubilettes are questionable, I am not sure it is correct to describe them as info revealed by creators from never published sources. An entire source book was released, in pdf format, granted it could have used editing at every level, but that is still something. It is some of the ideas and perhaps even the very point of the source book that raises questions.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 01:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cure</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>