http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Category_talk%3ADisease 2026-10-02T00:38:00Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.0 http://fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Disease&diff=35600&oldid=prev 2010-04-21T18:26:58Z

<p>moved from category:talk:disease</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Does Disease belong in Monsters? We have a family of Viruses in Monsters so to that extent yes. Should we however? Keep Disease and put the Viruses inside?<br /> <br /> it&#039;s a 2e vs. 3e thing. in 2e, they were monsters. In 3e, diseases. In reality, both. ;) I say put them all in disease, but anyt hat have been described as a monster in 2e as monsters as well. Is that reasonable?? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> OK, to be clear, Disease stays in Monsters as there is nowhere better and there is precedent, and the Viruses go in Disease? I am fine with that.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> Sounds good. Does Disease go in Other Monster Groupings? Or stay in Monster? I think I&#039;m ok with either. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> I stuck it in Other Monster Groupings, but now that you mention it, perhaps straight Monster would be better. Anyone else have a thought on this?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 01:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)</div>

Admin