Anne Rice's Vampires, anyone?
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:43 pm
I just finished reading Interview With the Vampire. I liked it because, in a way, I feel it makes vampires not "humans with super-cool powers" (a la Underworld, Dracula 2000, or other images of vampires), but simply dead parasites with no real purpose to existence.
It does make one wonder - could they bring back that purpose? Let's say, instead of despairing and deciding he would never find "art," Louis had tried to develop his own artistic skills. Would that have brought back part of his "humanity?" Something of his former "passion?" Or were those qualities of his so rooted in denial of his true death and self-loathing that, once he accepted that he was really dead, he could never reagain them?
I haven't read any other of her books. Maybe she discusses this further there...
In game terms, would Anne Rice's vampires care enough to gain class levels? Or would they simply stagnate? Would they become the revenants of Eastern Europe, with no real purpose except mindlessly to feed and reproduce?
Maybe I'm interpreting her image wrong. I'd be interested to hear anyone else's thoughts/comments...
It does make one wonder - could they bring back that purpose? Let's say, instead of despairing and deciding he would never find "art," Louis had tried to develop his own artistic skills. Would that have brought back part of his "humanity?" Something of his former "passion?" Or were those qualities of his so rooted in denial of his true death and self-loathing that, once he accepted that he was really dead, he could never reagain them?
I haven't read any other of her books. Maybe she discusses this further there...
In game terms, would Anne Rice's vampires care enough to gain class levels? Or would they simply stagnate? Would they become the revenants of Eastern Europe, with no real purpose except mindlessly to feed and reproduce?
Maybe I'm interpreting her image wrong. I'd be interested to hear anyone else's thoughts/comments...