Page 1 of 1
Possible idea for a Gentleman Caller child
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2026 9:27 pm
by Teravala
This might be kind of like wearing a hat on a hat, but how do we feel about the idea of a child of the GC who is a grandchild of Maeve? This would make them 1/4 fey, 1/4 vistani, and half fiend. To me, it seems like a POWERFUL lineage, deep ties to the land itself, and a deep well of supernatural abilities to draw upon. VR guide to the shadow fey talks about 1/4 fey, and It seems like Maeve isn't above taking a mortal for a lover.
Re: Possible idea for a Gentleman Caller child
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2026 11:08 pm
by The Dark
It sounds perfectly fine to me. My only observation is that wasn't in the plans, since each Gaz was to have one child of the Caller, and the one for Gaz V was Chezna. It could still work, since III had no Child and IV had two, so I mention it only as a lead-in to discussing the remaining planned groups of domains.
The planned remaining Gaz:
VI - Liffe, Vechor, Nocturnal Sea (including minor islands)
VII - Sea of Sorrows, Blaustein, Ghastria, Dominia, Markovia
VIII - Souragne, Saragoss, Sri Raji, Wildlands
IX - G'Henna, Har'Akir, Sebua, Pharazia
X - Nidala, Avonleigh, Shadowborn Manor, Odiare
XI - Paridon, Timor, Vorostokov, Sanguinia
XII - Farelle, Rokushima Taiyoo, I'Cath, New Domain 1
XIII - Staunton Bluffs, New Domain 2, New Domain 3, Bluetspur
We know XIII would have been the Familiar, so Staunton Bluffs and Bluetspur don't have a Child.
Anything for the other sets of domains will probably need to be made de novo, since a lot of those domains were barely (if at all) touched on in earlier materials, and don't have as many convenient hooks laying around. Looking through Mistipedia, I only found a very small number of Vistani associated with any of those domains:
Madam Fayina - her tribe travels somewhere along the coast of the Sea of Sorrows (Children of the Night: Vampires)
Marda - her tribe travels in G'Henna (Circle of Darkness)
Valana - a raunie not referred to as Madam/Madame, she's in Souragne (Night of the Walking Dead)
Re: Possible idea for a Gentleman Caller child
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2026 12:02 am
by Teravala
The Dark wrote: Thu Jan 15, 2026 11:08 pm
It sounds perfectly fine to me. My only observation is that wasn't in the plans, since each Gaz was to have one child of the Caller, and the one for Gaz V was Chezna. It could still work, since III had no Child and IV had two, so I mention it only as a lead-in to discussing the remaining planned groups of domains.
The planned remaining Gaz:
VI - Liffe, Vechor, Nocturnal Sea (including minor islands)
VII - Sea of Sorrows, Blaustein, Ghastria, Dominia, Markovia
VIII - Souragne, Saragoss, Sri Raji, Wildlands
IX - G'Henna, Har'Akir, Sebua, Pharazia
X - Nidala, Avonleigh, Shadowborn Manor, Odiare
XI - Paridon, Timor, Vorostokov, Sanguinia
XII - Farelle, Rokushima Taiyoo, I'Cath, New Domain 1
XIII - Staunton Bluffs, New Domain 2, New Domain 3, Bluetspur
We know XIII would have been the Familiar, so Staunton Bluffs and Bluetspur don't have a Child.
Anything for the other sets of domains will probably need to be made
de novo, since a lot of those domains were barely (if at all) touched on in earlier materials, and don't have as many convenient hooks laying around. Looking through Mistipedia, I only found a very small number of Vistani associated with any of those domains:
Madam Fayina - her tribe travels somewhere along the coast of the Sea of Sorrows (Children of the Night: Vampires)
Marda - her tribe travels in G'Henna (Circle of Darkness)
Valana - a raunie not referred to as Madam/Madame, she's in Souragne (Night of the Walking Dead)
That's such a better answer than I was hoping for. I didnt know the planned order of the rest of the gaz so I was just kind of spitballing something. I did know that III didnt have one, so I figured president had been set for one domain to have 2, but I also had forgotten they covered the SR in gaz V.
Thank you for the info, being able to copy pasta that into my DM notes is huge.