VRGtR: Call-backs and other Continuity Nods
Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 11:02 am
Hey gang, I've been thumbing through my copy of VRGtR and I keep noticing little shout-outs to that-which-has-gone-before.
Some of them are inconsequential to the plot ... simply mentioning a place name or minor NPC. A continuity nod, little more. A wink to those in the know.
Others carry a bit more weight ... calling attention to plot points that existed prior the publication of this book and are relevant to the current situation. A call-back, as it were, where knowledge of the thing being referenced actually changes the context of the scene/setting in which it is being mentioned.
I propose that this thread be a bit of a repository for such things.
I'll be honest ... I'm starting this thread out of a nagging sense that I'm missing the 'bigger picture.' VRGtR uses a ton of these named NPC's and place names ... but not always with a ton of context. When the character/place/event actually gets named in VRGtR, they have been sort of easy to research and Mistipedia has been a great help. I've been able to refresh my memory on a bunch of neat stuff — the list of noble families of Borca, and amost every named NPC in Har'Akir comes to mind — but I have this nagging suspicion that I'm missing some of the finer points because the references are too oblique.
An example of what I mean by oblique would be the passing reference to Sithicus (and possibly Cavitius?) contained in the writeup for Klorr. Without mentioning them by name — referring to a tower like a blackened rose and a city of skulls, respectively — it might be hard to pick up on the intended reference if one were not familiar with that-which-has-gone-before.
Now, while I cannot control where folks might wander off when the inevitable conversation-tangents strike ... I will say that in my mind's eye, this thread should have an informal 'Dragnet' rule in effect. That is, just the facts.
For example: If such-and-such NPC is mentioned on pg 53 ... then it would be appropriate to call attention to the previous supplements that the NPC came from. But maybe not, necessarily, that you disagree with that NPC's usage/placement/reimagining.
***
Here is an example of what I am getting at.
In the Adventures in Kartakass there is a reference to Radaga, and a mention of a search for a mysterious crown.
Two entries earlier on that same list there is a mystery centered around a play wherein one of the actors is found murdered. The actor, as it happens, is well known for playing a character that meets the same fate.
Now, the first is obvious. Feast of Goblyns, naturally. But the second one is a lot more oblique ... and I'm left wondering if this adventure hook already existed elsewhere in lore/canon or is being created from whole cloth.
I know it's a bit of a scavenger hunt and a lot to ask, but if folks find that they are making connections between the old and the new ... I think this thread would be a neat place to list some of it to help the others who might be missing the clues.
Thanks for your attention, gang, and happy hunting!
Some of them are inconsequential to the plot ... simply mentioning a place name or minor NPC. A continuity nod, little more. A wink to those in the know.
Others carry a bit more weight ... calling attention to plot points that existed prior the publication of this book and are relevant to the current situation. A call-back, as it were, where knowledge of the thing being referenced actually changes the context of the scene/setting in which it is being mentioned.
I propose that this thread be a bit of a repository for such things.
I'll be honest ... I'm starting this thread out of a nagging sense that I'm missing the 'bigger picture.' VRGtR uses a ton of these named NPC's and place names ... but not always with a ton of context. When the character/place/event actually gets named in VRGtR, they have been sort of easy to research and Mistipedia has been a great help. I've been able to refresh my memory on a bunch of neat stuff — the list of noble families of Borca, and amost every named NPC in Har'Akir comes to mind — but I have this nagging suspicion that I'm missing some of the finer points because the references are too oblique.
An example of what I mean by oblique would be the passing reference to Sithicus (and possibly Cavitius?) contained in the writeup for Klorr. Without mentioning them by name — referring to a tower like a blackened rose and a city of skulls, respectively — it might be hard to pick up on the intended reference if one were not familiar with that-which-has-gone-before.
Now, while I cannot control where folks might wander off when the inevitable conversation-tangents strike ... I will say that in my mind's eye, this thread should have an informal 'Dragnet' rule in effect. That is, just the facts.
For example: If such-and-such NPC is mentioned on pg 53 ... then it would be appropriate to call attention to the previous supplements that the NPC came from. But maybe not, necessarily, that you disagree with that NPC's usage/placement/reimagining.
***
Here is an example of what I am getting at.
In the Adventures in Kartakass there is a reference to Radaga, and a mention of a search for a mysterious crown.
Two entries earlier on that same list there is a mystery centered around a play wherein one of the actors is found murdered. The actor, as it happens, is well known for playing a character that meets the same fate.
Now, the first is obvious. Feast of Goblyns, naturally. But the second one is a lot more oblique ... and I'm left wondering if this adventure hook already existed elsewhere in lore/canon or is being created from whole cloth.
I know it's a bit of a scavenger hunt and a lot to ask, but if folks find that they are making connections between the old and the new ... I think this thread would be a neat place to list some of it to help the others who might be missing the clues.
Thanks for your attention, gang, and happy hunting!