Café de Nuit

Hmmm? How?

alhoon wrote:Hmmm? How?

The SRD and everything Pathfinder releases is open out there on the internet free. Technically you don't have to buy the books to play pathfinder in almost it's entirety. I still have bought most of the books because I prefer books over PDF's or scrolling through SRD/OGL. I'm just wondering how PF sales are compared to how DnD did with 3.x

Well, I've played a couple of PF campaigns just by using the SRD (and I prefer the 3.5 classes AND the grapple rules of 3.5. They really are NOT that complicated)

About the DMG:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/article ... e-Mearls.4

"I want to have more detailed rules for a grim and grittier game, more of a horror game." That's where the DMG comes in,"

Hmmm.... not bad.

"People like to tinker with their campaigns, and especially if you've been DMing for a while and you kind of want to do something different. Really going into in-depth [changes]. And now, it's not going to be deconstructing everything, but it's giving you the tools you need to make your own changes. "

That's actually nice and finally ties in with the "modularity" promised since the start of D&D next. OK, I kinda expected the options to be on the table and tools to make more, but even just the tools to make the changes sounds good.


ALSO:
"When black roses bloom" Ravenloft adventure out this week.
I know it's considered a classic, but should I buy it?

alhoon wrote:About the DMG:

ALSO:
"When black roses bloom" Ravenloft adventure out this week.
I know it's considered a classic, but should I buy it?

I bought the download. The adventure looks pretty good, but it seems like there is a map of Soth's castle missing from the download.

Band2 wrote:
I bought the download. The adventure looks pretty good, but it seems like there is a map of Soth's castle missing from the download.

They have added the castle map to the download now. So it is complete.

http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx ... x/20140626

The Nothic got some interesting backhistory!
They develop from wizards that unlocked too much forbidden lore for their own good, and lost themselves in the process!
They also have the ability of "weird insight": By watching a creature they can learn one of its secrets.

I would say that's a nice terror path.

That's... dare I say it... a gothic nothic.

What's your overall impression on the new ruleset, gentlemen?

Le Noir Faineant wrote:What's your overall impression on the new ruleset, gentlemen?

So far I really, really dig it.
It's hard to say if it's really solid without checking out the PHB and MM and DMG, but so far it really looks like D&D and has a LOT of classic elements and design but is really balanced and tight.
It's flexible for the DM and characters seem fairly fragile at low levels but not overly death prone while high level characters don't seem invincible.
Magic items are not assumed. There's nice flexibility in the classes and races.

I think it'd be a really solid system for Ravenloft.

Jester of the FoS wrote:

Le Noir Faineant wrote:What's your overall impression on the new ruleset, gentlemen?

So far I really, really dig it.

I think it'd be a really solid system for Ravenloft.

That.

alhoon wrote:

Jester of the FoS wrote:

Le Noir Faineant wrote:What's your overall impression on the new ruleset, gentlemen?

So far I really, really dig it.

I think it'd be a really solid system for Ravenloft.

That.

I'm already hard at work at a Ravenloft 5e Update.

Good. I'll throw in some monsters, since we play D&D next with my sister and a friend, so I can test stuff.

As for revision: I prefer the 6 stages PChecks!

alhoon wrote:Good. I'll throw in some monsters, since we play D&D next with my sister and a friend, so I can test stuff.

Right now I'm poking away at races, and not thinking about monsters.

But there's no reason we can't start. CrowdForge this bastard for 5e.
Here's a shared monster document, anyone can edit.

alhoon wrote:As for revision: I prefer the 6 stages PChecks!

I'll keep the Power Checks thing in mind when I get to that.

Good. Can you get it in a thread instead of a hijacking another one?