Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:44 am
I would also like to see it. If you could send it my way too, whenever it is ready, that would be great. My email is stygiansalt@gmail.com.
Welcome, friends, to our establishment.
https://www.fraternityofshadows.com/forum/
https://www.fraternityofshadows.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1468
Amen! That sounds like some good reading right there!The Giamarga wrote:Why not make it available on the site?
Okay day.Boccaccio Barbarossa wrote:Amen! That sounds like some good reading right there!The Giamarga wrote:Why not make it available on the site?
Given that DL trilogy robbed us of Lord Soth, I don't find the comparison amusing..Desdichado wrote:Yeah! Ravenloft: War of Souls!
Having become my universal denomination for hasty, pseudo-cataclysmic and money-hungry sequel-writing, War of Souls was indeed one of the worst books I ever read and destroyed the flair of DL completely, IMO.Mortepierre wrote:Given that DL trilogy robbed us of Lord Soth, I don't find the comparison amusing..Desdichado wrote:Yeah! Ravenloft: War of Souls!
*shrug*The idea for The TOUD was just to stimulate creative minds. I was more than disappointed. I considered it an opt out from Steve Miller et al (sorry Steve!)
Amen to that. Too much canon is confining. I like some stability because it gives everyone a "stable" base, something that everyone can accpet as part of the game world, but too much can kill.Steve Miller wrote:*shrug*The idea for The TOUD was just to stimulate creative minds. I was more than disappointed. I considered it an opt out from Steve Miller et al (sorry Steve!)
I've never believed in spoonfeeding when it comes to campaign settings. What Willowhugger did was exactly what the ToUD concept was always intended to bring about.
DoD NEVER said there was a boxed set coming, and even when I wanted to use the ToUD as the touchstone for the product that became "Die Vecna Die!", it still would have been left flexible enough so that it could be used to spawn as many campaigns as possible. (The ToUD idea actually has its roots in "Bleak House", because I wanted to keep Van Ricthen around. I didn't like the idea of killing off the character.)
I'm sorry if my material wasn't up to your standards, but I've never been shy about my approach to writing game material.
I understand Steve and frankly given that with the '1 year=1 year of game time" that we'd not see it for 25 years, I probably picked up on the fact it'd never be detailed. However, I wanted it to be though and also give a hurrah for the setting.
*shrug*
I've never believed in spoonfeeding when it comes to campaign settings. What Willowhugger did was exactly what the ToUD concept was always intended to bring about
Sorry Steve. I wasn't having a go. I was just expressing how I felt when I found out there's be no 'TOUD' supplement/boxed set. I'd assumed there'd be a forthcoming boxed set.Steve Miller wrote:*shrug*The idea for The TOUD was just to stimulate creative minds. I was more than disappointed. I considered it an opt out from Steve Miller et al (sorry Steve!)
I've never believed in spoonfeeding when it comes to campaign settings. What Willowhugger did was exactly what the ToUD concept was always intended to bring about.
DoD NEVER said there was a boxed set coming, and even when I wanted to use the ToUD as the touchstone for the product that became "Die Vecna Die!", it still would have been left flexible enough so that it could be used to spawn as many campaigns as possible. (The ToUD idea actually has its roots in "Bleak House", because I wanted to keep Van Ricthen around. I didn't like the idea of killing off the character.)
I'm sorry if my material wasn't up to your standards, but I've never been shy about my approach to writing game material.
See Dragonlance...Boccaccio Barbarossa wrote:
Amen to that. Too much canon is confining. I like some stability because it gives everyone a "stable" base, something that everyone can accpet as part of the game world, but too much can kill.
No worries. No offense was taken, because it seemed pretty clear that you weren't attempting to cause any. I was just trying to explain my viewpoint on the issue. (Heck, the only time I take offense at someone expressing dissapointment the way you were is if it's coming from someone who hasn't even bothered to read the material they are 'dissapointed' in. You'd read, you'd hoped, and you had a legitimate reaction.)monty-- wrote: Sorry Steve. I wasn't having a go. I was just expressing how I felt when I found out there's be no 'TOUD' supplement/boxed set. I'd assumed there'd be a forthcoming boxed set.
As for your work, it is at a high standard! I was just bitterly disappointed with no forthcoming TOUD.
Sorry if I offended you.